Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Visibility, Prayer and Defense

Beloved National Family,

As we approach the Triduum, the three Highest and Holiest Days of the Church’s Year, please permit your unworthy National Minister to make three requests from you: Visibility; Prayer and Defense.

First, visibility. Our International Fraternity has urged “Presence in the World” as one of our priorities at the last International Chapter ( During these High Holy Days, many of us will be gathering with our Diocesan Bishop at the Chrism Mass and with our clergy, religious and lay faithful at Holy Thursday, Good Friday, Holy Saturday and Easter Sunday liturgies. Please, at all times wear your Tau Cross and introduce yourself as a Secular Franciscan following Christ to the Cross in the footsteps of Sts. Francis and Clare. Greet your Bishop, your Pastor, the clergy and religious with “Peace.” Offer your service, support and prayers. If possible, sit at these liturgies with brothers and sisters from your own local fraternities. Be Franciscan! Be peaceful! Be visible!

Second, prayer. Let us now and always pray for one another, especially now as we gather at these Solemn Liturgies. Our Lord will be so close to us during these three holiest days. Intercede for all our Secular Franciscan family and for all our Franciscan Order.

May I ask you to pray for three things in particular: one, pray for Youth. As far as I know, we have only one “officially constituted” youth fraternity in the whole United States. Most of our fraternities have few if any members in their twenties, thirties or even forties. Pray that we may attract more youth into our Order and be more “youthful” ourselves, regardless of our physical ages!

Two, pray for Spiritual Assistance. Pray always to the Holy Spirit for guidance. Pray that we ourselves may be more Spiritually-minded. Pray for all of our Spiritual Assistants. Pray that we may have more “capable and well-prepared” (General Constitutions Article 88.1) Spiritual Assistants for all of the fraternities-- local, regional, national and international--in our Order.

Three, pray for Unity in our Fraternities, in our Families, in our Church, in our Country. Why do we tear each other apart? On his last night, our Lord prayed fervently “that they may all be one, as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may be in us” (John 17:21). We are called to be “Instruments of God’s Peace,” and we can’t get along: fellow Franciscans, blood relations, fellow Catholics, fellow Americans. Please pray that we might “(d)o nothing out of selfishness or out of vainglory; rather, humbly regard others as more important than yourselves, each looking out not for his own interests, but (also) everyone for those of others. Have among yourselves the same attitude that is also yours in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 2:3-5).

Third, and finally, defense. St. Francis knew that Holy Mother Church could never be perfect as long as it had sinners in it like him and me. He knew the failings of brother priests. Still, he knew that he could only receive the Lord in the Most Blessed Sacrament from their hands. Still, he was always faithful to the Holy Father. Let us never be afraid or ashamed to speak in defense of Holy Mother Church, her Holy Father, Bishops and Priests.

My beloved sisters and brothers of penance, as you know, the Holy Spirit is the only Advocate that the Church, the Holy Father or we need. We may have read or heard about the recent stories in the New York Times and the Associated Press, but we may not have heard reported two other voices, which I share with you, one from Father Thomas Brundage, JLC, and the other from Archbishop Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York.

First, Father Thomas Brundage, the then-presiding judge for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee gives first-person account of church trial: (


To provide context to this article, I was the Judicial Vicar for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee from 1995-2003. During those years, I presided over four canonical criminal cases, one of which involved Father Lawrence Murphy. Two of the four men died during the process. God alone will judge these men.

To put some parameters on the following remarks, I am writing this article with the express knowledge and consent of Archbishop Roger Schwietz, OMI, the Archbishop of Anchorage, where I currently serve. Archbishop Schwietz is also the publisher of the Catholic Anchor newspaper.

I will limit my comments, because of judicial oaths I have taken as a canon lawyer and as an ecclesiastical judge. However, since my name and comments in the matter of the Father Murphy case have been liberally and often inaccurately quoted in the New York Times and in more than 100 other newspapers and on-line periodicals, I feel a freedom to tell part of the story of Father Murphy’s trial from ground zero.

As I have found that the reporting on this issue has been inaccurate and poor in terms of the facts, I am also writing out of a sense of duty to the truth.

The fact that I presided over this trial and have never once been contacted by any news organization for comment speaks for itself.

My intent in the following paragraphs is to accomplish the following:

To tell the back-story of what actually happened in the Father Murphy case on the local level;

To outline the sloppy and inaccurate reporting on the Father Murphy case by the New York Times and other media outlets;

To assert that Pope Benedict XVI has done more than any other pope or bishop in history to rid the Catholic Church of the scourge of child sexual abuse and provide for those who have been injured;

To set the record straight with regards to the efforts made by the church to heal the wounds caused by clergy sexual misconduct. The Catholic Church is probably the safest place for children at this point in history.

Before proceeding, it is important to point out the scourge that child sexual abuse has been — not only for the church but for society as well. Few actions can distort a child’s life more than sexual abuse. It is a form of emotional and spiritual homicide and it starts a trajectory toward a skewed sense of sexuality. When committed by a person in authority, it creates a distrust of almost anyone, anywhere.

As a volunteer prison chaplain in Alaska, I have found a corollary between those who have been incarcerated for child sexual abuse and the priests who have committed such grievous actions. They tend to be very smart and manipulative. They tend to be well liked and charming. They tend to have one aim in life — to satisfy their hunger. Most are highly narcissistic and do not see the harm that they have caused. They view the children they have abused not as people but as objects. They rarely show remorse and moreover, sometimes portray themselves as the victims. They are, in short, dangerous people and should never be trusted again. Most will recommit their crimes if given a chance.

As for the numerous reports about the case of Father Murphy, the back-story has not been reported as of yet.

In 1996, I was introduced to the story of Father Murphy, formerly the principal of St. John’s School for the Deaf in Milwaukee. It had been common knowledge for decades that during Father Murphy’s tenure at the school (1950-1974) there had been a scandal at St. John’s involving him and some deaf children. The details, however, were sketchy at best.

Courageous advocacy on behalf of the victims (and often their wives), led the Archdiocese of Milwaukee to revisit the matter in 1996. In internal discussions of the curia for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, it became obvious that we needed to take strong and swift action with regard to the wrongs of several decades ago. With the consent of then-Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland, we began an investigation into the allegations of child sexual abuse as well as the violation of the crime of solicitation within the confessional by Father Murphy.

We proceeded to start a trial against Father Murphy. I was the presiding judge in this matter and informed Father Murphy that criminal charges were going to be levied against him with regard to child sexual abuse and solicitation in the confessional.

In my interactions with Father Murphy, I got the impression I was dealing with a man who simply did not get it. He was defensive and threatening.

Between 1996 and August, 1998, I interviewed, with the help of a qualified interpreter, about a dozen victims of Father Murphy. These were gut-wrenching interviews. In one instance the victim had become a perpetrator himself and had served time in prison for his crimes. I realized that this disease is virulent and was easily transmitted to others. I heard stories of distorted lives, sexualities diminished or expunged. These were the darkest days of my own priesthood, having been ordained less than 10 years at the time. Grace-filled spiritual direction has been a Godsend.

I also met with a community board of deaf Catholics. They insisted that Father Murphy should be removed from the priesthood and highly important to them was their request that he be buried not as a priest but as a layperson. I indicated that a judge, I could not guarantee the first request and could only make a recommendation to the latter request. In the summer of 1998, I ordered Father Murphy to be present at a deposition at the chancery in Milwaukee. I received, soon after, a letter from his doctor that he was in frail health and could travel not more than 20 miles (Boulder Junction to Milwaukee would be about 276 miles). A week later, Father Murphy died of natural causes in a location about 100 miles from his home

With regard to the inaccurate reporting on behalf of the New York Times, the Associated Press, and those that utilized these resources, first of all, I was never contacted by any of these news agencies but they felt free to quote me. Almost all of my quotes are from a document that can be found online with the correspondence between the Holy See and the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. In an October 31, 1997 handwritten document, I am quoted as saying ‘odds are that this situation may very well be the most horrendous, number wise, and especially because these are physically challenged, vulnerable people. “Also quoted is this: “Children were approached within the confessional where the question of circumcision began the solicitation.”

The problem with these statements attributed to me is that they were handwritten. The documents were not written by me and do not resemble my handwriting. The syntax is similar to what I might have said but I have no idea who wrote these statements, yet I am credited as stating them. As a college freshman at the Marquette University School of Journalism, we were told to check, recheck, and triple check our quotes if necessary. I was never contacted by anyone on this document, written by an unknown source to me. Discerning truth takes time and it is apparent that the New York Times, the Associated Press and others did not take the time to get the facts correct.

Additionally, in the documentation in a letter from Archbishop Weakland to then-secretary of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone on August 19, 1998, Archbishop Weakland stated that he had instructed me to abate the proceedings against Father Murphy. Father Murphy, however, died two days later and the fact is that on the day that Father Murphy died, he was still the defendant in a church criminal trial. No one seems to be aware of this. Had I been asked to abate this trial, I most certainly would have insisted that an appeal be made to the supreme court of the church, or Pope John Paul II if necessary. That process would have taken months if not longer.

Second, with regard to the role of then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI), in this matter, I have no reason to believe that he was involved at all. Placing this matter at his doorstep is a huge leap of logic and information.

Third, the competency to hear cases of sexual abuse of minors shifted from the Roman Rota to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith headed by Cardinal Ratzinger in 2001. Until that time, most appeal cases went to the Rota and it was our experience that cases could languish for years in this court. When the competency was changed to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in my observation as well as many of my canonical colleagues, sexual abuse cases were handled expeditiously, fairly, and with due regard to the rights of all the parties involved. I have no doubt that this was the work of then Cardinal Ratzinger.

Fourth, Pope Benedict has repeatedly apologized for the shame of the sexual abuse of children in various venues and to a worldwide audience. This has never happened before. He has met with victims. He has reigned in entire conferences of bishops on this matter, the Catholic Bishops of Ireland being the most recent. He has been most reactive and proactive of any international church official in history with regard to the scourge of clergy sexual abuse of minors. Instead of blaming him for inaction on these matters, he has truly been a strong and effective leader on these issues.

Finally, over the last 25 years, vigorous action has taken place within the church to avoid harm to children. Potential seminarians receive extensive sexual-psychological evaluation prior to admission. Virtually all seminaries concentrate their efforts on the safe environment for children. There have been very few cases of recent sexual abuse of children by clergy during the last decade or more.

Catholic dioceses all across the country have taken extraordinary steps to ensure the safety of children and vulnerable adults. As one example, which is by no means unique, is in the Archdiocese of Anchorage, where I currently work. Here, virtually every public bathroom in parishes has a sign asking if a person has been abuse by anyone in the church. A phone number is given to report the abuse and almost all church workers in the archdiocese are required to take yearly formation sessions in safe environment classes. I am not sure what more the church can do.

To conclude, the events during the 1960’s and 1970’s of the sexual abuse of minors and solicitation in the confessional by Father Lawrence Murphy are unmitigated and gruesome crimes. On behalf of the church, I am deeply sorry and ashamed for the wrongs that have been done by my brother priests but realize my sorrow is probably of little importance 40 years after the fact. The only thing that we can do at this time is to learn the truth, beg for forgiveness, and do whatever is humanly possible to heal the wounds. The rest, I am grateful, is in God’s hands.

Father Thomas T. Brundage, JCL

Editor’s note: Father Brundage can be contacted at or by phone at (907) 745-3229 X 11.

Second, Archbishop Dolan (

Archbishop Timothy M. Dolan, Archbishop of New York, made the following remarks at the conclusion of Palm Sunday Mass in Saint Patrick’s Cathedral in New York on Sunday, March 28, 2010.

"May I ask your patience a couple of minutes longer in what has already been a lengthy — yet hopefully uplifting —Sunday Mass?

"The somberness of Holy Week is intensified for Catholics this year.

"The recent tidal wave of headlines about abuse of minors by some few priests, this time in Ireland, Germany, and a re-run of an old story from Wisconsin, has knocked us to our knees once again.

"Anytime this horror, vicious sin, and nauseating crime is reported, as it needs to be, victims and their families are wounded again, the vast majority of faithful priests bow their heads in shame anew, and sincere Catholics experience another dose of shock, sorrow, and even anger.

"What deepens the sadness now is the unrelenting insinuations against the Holy Father himself, as certain sources seem frenzied to implicate the man who, perhaps more than anyone else has been the leader in purification, reform, and renewal that the Church so needs.

"Sunday Mass is hardly the place to document the inaccuracy, bias, and hyperbole of such aspersions.

"But, Sunday Mass is indeed the time for Catholics to pray for “ . . . Benedict our Pope."

"And Palm Sunday Mass is sure a fitting place for us to express our love and solidarity for our earthly shepherd now suffering some of the same unjust accusations, shouts of the mob, and scourging at the pillar, as did Jesus.

"No one has been more vigorous in cleansing the Church of the effects of this sickening sin than the man we now call Pope Benedict XVI. The dramatic progress that the Catholic Church in the United States has made — — documented again just last week by the report made by independent forensic auditors — — could never have happened without the insistence and support of the very man now being daily crowned with thorns by groundless innuendo.

"Does the Church and her Pastor, Pope Benedict XVI, need intense scrutiny and just criticism for tragic horrors long past?

"Yes! He himself has asked for it, encouraging complete honesty, at the same time expressing contrition, and urging a thorough cleansing.

"All we ask is that it be fair, and that the Catholic Church not be singled-out for a horror that has cursed every culture, religion, organization, institution, school, agency, and family in the world.

“Sorry to bring this up … but, then again, the Eucharist is the Sunday meal of the spiritual family we call the Church. At Sunday dinner we share both joys and sorrows. The father of our family, il papa, needs our love, support, and prayers."

These three requests I repeat: Visibility, Prayer and Defense. Through the intercessions of Sts. Francis and Clare and all the Franciscan saints, canonized or known only to God, through the petitions of our Patroness, Our Blessed Mother, may the Lord grant us, our fraternities, our families, our Church, our Nation, our Earth every Peace and Blessing during this Holy Week, Triduum and Easter Season.

Peace and love,


Friday, March 19, 2010

Secular Franciscan hopes to land chapel at Mitchell

This article is from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. See the original at Suzanne McKinney is a Secular Franciscan in the LaVerna Regional Fraternity.

The full text of the article is included here to ensure that it continues to be available to our readers.

Parishioner hopes to land chapel at Mitchell

By Annysa Johnson of the [Milwaukee] Journal Sentinel

Posted [on the newspaper's website]: March 5, 2010

For years, travelers would stop at St. Stephen's Catholic Church on S. Howell Ave. for a moment of prayer before flying out of Milwaukee's Mitchell International Airport.

That changed last fall when the 162-year-old congregation moved to its new building in Oak Creek.

Soon, though, travelers of all faiths may find a new place for prayer and meditation - in the airport itself.

St. Stephen's parishioner Suzanne McKinney of Cudahy is spearheading an effort to build an interfaith chapel at Mitchell, modeling it after facilities at Chicago's O'Hare and Midway airports.

"Travelers are often under stress, and they need a little time for peace," said McKinney, who has founded a nonprofit organization, Interfaith Airport Chapel of Milwaukee, to promote and fund the chapel.

Airport spokeswoman Pat Rowe said the proposal is preliminary and must be approved by the Milwaukee County Board, which oversees Mitchell. Airport management is open to the idea but has stressed that any facility would need to be welcoming to people of all faiths.

"Our understanding is that it would not endorse any particular religion or view of God," Rowe said. "Some people may want to use it as just a quiet place to meditate."

That's the plan, said McKinney, a devout Roman Catholic who belongs to a religious fraternity known as the Secular Franciscans.

"Each chapel is different," she said of the 151 around the world that are affiliated with the International Association of Civil Aviation Chaplains. "Some are just a meditation room, some have full-time chaplains. They're as varied as you can imagine."

Milwaukee's profile will depend on the faith communities that choose to participate and how much they want to invest in a presence there.

The Chicago chapels, which will mark their 50th year in November, are open around the clock, offering regularly scheduled Catholic, nondenominational and Muslim services.

"These are the three faith groups in Chicago that wanted to do ministry here, but we have many others on our board of directors," said Susan Schneider, chapel administrator.

Created originally for employees whose schedules kept them from their religious obligations, they've become a mecca for travelers, drawing as many as 150,000 visitors annually just through the O'Hare chapel, she said.

McKinney was inspired after a visit to the lay ministry department at Cardinal Stritch University, where she learned that some graduates may go on to work in so-called mobility ministries - on cruise ships or traveling circuses, airports and truck stops.

It made her think: Does Mitchell have a chapel? The answer was no. So she set about creating one.

The group is looking at about 600 square feet in the Mitchell parking garage, accessible through the walkway that connects the ramp to the terminal.

It's beefing up its board of directors, working with an architect who has expertise in liturgical design, and planning a capital campaign with a target of around $300,000.

And they're hoping to incorporate some elements of the old St. Stephen's Church.

"We've received some stained-glass windows, some marble from the sanctuary, a few pews," said McKinney.

"No statues, no crosses, because it will be interfaith. But it's going to be a beautiful, spiritual place."

For information

The Interfaith Airport Chapel of Milwaukee can be reached at P.O. Box 402, South Milwaukee, WI 53172, or by calling (414) 570-9906.